FAQ About the Role of the Dog
Behavior Expert in Personal Injury Lawsuits

Richard H. Polsky, Ph.D., CAAB

Los Angeles, CA.

Telephone: 310-474-3776

e-mail: richardhpolsky@mac.com

Home page: www.dogexpert.com



Q. Why is a expert in animal behavior needed?

A. Frequently, there is dispute between parties about liability for the incident. Questions about liability are frequently related to questions about the temperament of the dog or how the incident might have happened. A behavioral expert can assist an attorney in the following manner:

Q. In what capacity can the behavioral expert serve the personal injury attorney?

A. There are several ways in which this can happen; namely:

Q. Who should qualify as a dog behavioral expert?

A. In addition to one's practical experience in working with dogs, there are other important criteria that sets the qualified dog behavioral expert apart from other self-professed experts. In reality, anyone can claim to be an "expert". For example, there are caninebehavioral "experts" who know how to "market" themselves really well but who possess very little in terms of qualifications other than what they say they have (which oftenis difficult to varify). Individuals like these often join forensic professional societies to project the impression that they are qualified. Experts like these are experts at being experts. In general, the attorney will be best served if he finds an expert who posseses the following qualifications: Certification as abehaviorist either through the Animal Behavior Society or the American Veterinary Medical Association; Publication record in peer-reviewed journals of veterinary medicine or animal behavior; Advanced degree in animal behavior from a recognized institution of higher learning; Research experience in the field of animal behavior.

Q. What kind of animal behavior evidence is needed to substantiate legal arguments?

A. Some States, like California, have statutory strict liability for dog bites. Legally, if the incident happened in a State where dog bite law applies, then the burden lies with the defense to demonstrate the comparitive fault of the plantiff. Forensic evidence to support the occurrence of a bite may come in the form of medical records, photos of the injury, or results from behavioral testing to determine if the dog had the kind of temperament to bite or cause injury to a human. Other circumstantial evidence, such as the context in which the incident happened, is often very useful. Note that in the absence of direct evidence - such as the ability to inspect the dog - circumstantial evidence is a valid and accepted means on which the animal behaviorist can based opinions. In States where recovery is based solely on common law theory, evidence must be presented to demonstrate that the dog was dangerous by nature and that the owner or keeper had full awareness of this behavioral tendency. Again, evidence bearing on this issue can be presented in the form of behavioral testing, animal control reports, and what other people (e.g. neighbors, veterinarian,etc.) say about the dog. The expert witness in animal behavior uses this information to formulate behavioral opinions about how (i.e. behavioral reconstruction) the incident happened.